In the court we trust?
The people that have been serving in the Supreme Court have been trying to make themselves able to be the ones to make and pass laws since the time it came into being. They have the mind set that with there choices to how they think certain things should be in their eyes they are doing justice for all the people of the US. Well this is exactly the opposite of what they are really doing. over the years the members of the Supreme court have been following less of the constitution and more of the international views. With this happening they have and are finding ways, still, to bypass the rules in which they would normally have to follow in which the constitution proposes them to due so. Another reason why this is hurting and bringing down the American’s views and morals is that these people have no more ability to make these decisions then the common people of the US. In fact there have been many members in the supreme court that have been less fit to decide in a court case then the common citizen would be. Mental health, stroke (loss of memory), racism, discrimination, religion, financial trouble, and rigged court cases have all been factors in the leading causes for the downfall in the decision made by the people of the Supreme Court. One of the main ways the Supreme Court finds a way to make and change laws in favor of their views. By rigging a big deal case to turn out the way they want it to be, so that certain laws get brought up or new ones to be made. This means that the person being prosecuted could be walking away from a very large offense with only small offense charges, or non at all. This has happened more than once throughout the history of the Supreme Court. Examples of people who have served in the Supreme Court that have proven my point as being people who should not be running in America’s highest court system have been James Wilson, Robert C Grier, and Thurgood Marshall. Thurgood Marchall was considered a soap opera junkie, and spent a lot of his times within his chamber watching his TV. James Wilson had major financial problems and ran from the law for the rest of his life when he could not pay his debts. Robert C Grier slowly lost his mental health and in this condition he was the swinging vote in the Hepburn v. Griswold. Marshall left almost all of his writing opinions up to his clerks and half the time he never even bothered to overview them. He also stated in one of his speeches in Hawaii that the Constitution wasn’t fixed forever.
--The Third
The Supreme Court is not an authority that can be trusted to be fair and unbiased, the justices that serve on the Supreme Court are not elected by the people, once they are on, they are on there for good, and there is nobody to speak of who can hold them accountable. These justices are too sheltered to make rational decisions because they don’t have the perspective the common person has. The country is at the mercy of justices that we don’t know whether or not they can be trusted to care for the country.
--Ben Morgan
The First Amendment provides that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof (U.S. Constitutional Amendment 1).” Our forefathers thought that religious faith was important to our system of government and believed in the protection of religious minorities and looked to avoid the threat to religious liberty that might arise from a nationality established church.
There is one conclusion we can draw: The Supreme Court has simply abolished your right to freely exercise your religion in public. And I think that unless the courts are called to account on this, religious freedom in this country in seriously endangered. (to be continued)
--Pitu